Skip to content
0:00 / 0:00

Face Development in the Womb - Inside the Human Body: Creation - BBC

BBC

15M subscribers • 2 videos on Rounds

YouTube
  • Recommended by 1 person, in Biology Stack Exchange.
  • Presented by Michael Mosley, as the video describes them

For anyone, no background needed. Education, not medical advice.

6.8M views15 years ago1 recommendation

How the body worksAnatomyPhysiology

Michael Mosley explains how the human face develops and fuses together in the womb using CGI animation.

Subscribe and 🔔 to the BBC 👉 bit.ly/BBCYouTubeSub Watch the BBC first on iPlayer 👉 bbc.in/iPlayer-Home More about this programme: bbc.co.uk/programmes/b01102yg Michael Mosley talks about face development with extraordinary CGI produced especially for episode one of Inside the Human Body. #bbc

Why it's here

1 person recommends this

What people say. Recommended as a visual explanation of embryonic facial development and the origin of the philtrum.

Michael S Taylorin Biology Stack Exchange • Recommends

On “Why has our nose evolved with the nostrils facing down?”

I have not been able to find any studies that look specifically at the genetic mechanism for nose development. I certainly do not know but I'll offer up two hypotheses. My first hypothesis is that the elongated nose is a remnant of the elongated lower face of our ancestral species, as you note in your answer. Take a look at link to this video (1:17 long, the part relevant to this answer begins at 33 seconds) of a time-lapse composite showing the develop of the human face. Our face develops as two separate halves that meet together in the middle. That's what creates the philtrum under our nose. Watch the especially carefully from the 54 second mark to 1 minute mark. Note that our nostrils are poin…

Michael S Taylorin Biology Stack Exchange • Mentions

On “What is the "Spandrels" debate about?”

Short version The paper has nothing to do with punctuated equilibrum vs. gradualism (see also here), which was published a few years earlier. This debate is much different (but equally important, I think). The authors of the Spandrels paper criticized evolutionary biologists of taking a very narrow view of the evolutionary process. They claiming (wrongly) that evolutionary biologists believed that every single trait on an organism was an adaptation that resulted from natural selection. The trait would not be present unless it was an adaptation. The authors claimed (rightly) that traits could not be considered independently. Instead, the traits had to be considered in light of the evolu…