Skip to content
Rounds
0:00 / 0:00

The Skinner Box - How Games Condition People to Play More - Extra Credits

Extra Credits

309K subscribers • 1 video on Rounds

YouTube
  • Recommended by 2 people, in Hacker News, across 2 different months.

For anyone, no background needed. Education, not medical advice.

1.1M views14 years ago2 recommendations

Brain and nervesMental healthAddictionNeuroscience

An animated explanation of how game designers use Skinner boxes and operant conditioning to keep players engaged.

Engaging design is extremely important in games, but too often simple reward systems are used to keep players playing longer or spending more money on in-game purchases. There are far more interesting and immersive mechanics you can choose to put in your games. Subscribe for new episodes every Wednesday! bit.ly/SubToEC (---More below) (Original air date: November 24, 2010) _______ Get your Extra Credits gear at the store! bit.ly/ExtraStore Play games with us on Extra Play! bit.ly/WatchEXP Watch more episodes from this season of Extra Credits! bit.ly/2nrLiSZ Contribute community subtitles to Extra Credits: youtube.com/timedtext_cs_panel?c=UCCODtTcd5M1JavPCOr_Uydg&ta… Talk to us on Twitter (@ExtraCreditz): bit.ly/ECTweet Follow us on Facebook: bit.ly/ECFBPage Get our list of recommended games on Steam: bit.ly/ECCurator _________ Would you like James to speak at your school or organization? For info, contact us at: contact@extra-credits.net _________ ♪ Intro Music: "Penguin Cap" by CarboHydroM bit.ly/1eIHTDS ♪ Outro Music: "Consent (Make Me Dance)" by djpretzel ocremix.org/remix/OCR01186/

Why it's here

2 people recommend this

What people say. Recommended for its clear overview of how games exploit operant conditioning to drive engagement.

pdkl95in Hacker News • Recommends

On “Playing video games can improve our lives”

> time slips away It doesn't help that many modern games explicitly use Operant Conditioning to keep people playing. MMOs and "free to play" games are notorious, but you will find Skinner Boxes in a lot of modern games. Extra Credits has a nice overview, which includes a few design suggestions which games can use instead of hooking players with a reward schedule. link to this video Also, it's not just games - you will find Operant Conditioning style reward schedules in some "social media" businesses, too, which can waste someone's day just as bad as any game.
View on Hacker News

gloglain Hacker News • Recommends

On “Parents Who Pay to Be Watched”

Take a look at this video 1 for explanation, and possibly other Extra Credits videos if you're interested in game design. 1: link to this video
View on Hacker News

YCodein Hacker News • Mentions

On “How I Kicked My Smartphone Addiction, and Never Looked Back”

It was a long time ago and I wish I was less foggy on the details but I read this comment on Reddit by a purported neuroscientist or some such who was talking about how we don't actually enjoy social media. They described basically what you've said. We take the actions and get the tiny reward and our brain gets a little jolt of there you did it but when it comes right down to it we don't actually enjoy the activity. More importantly, we're no more satisfied when we finish the activity than we were when we started, we just do it because we've become conditioned to. I suppose a more concrete source would be the Extra Credits video on Skinner Boxes: link to this video
View on Hacker News

pdkl95in Hacker News • Mentions

On “EA reportedly under criminal investigation in Belgium due to FIFA's loot boxes”

…lue to the people playing the game, so trading them for lootboxes with uncertain contents is still a "wager". The gaming industry could solve a lot of this mess if they simply *sold people the game (or game pieces) directly as a defined product. Of course, that wouldn't exploit the human weakness to operant conditioning2... ~sigh~ 1 link 2 link to this video…
View on Hacker News

stcredzeroin Hacker News • Mentions

On “Activision Blizzard staff reportedly bracing for layoffs”

These days though, monetization frequently means vastly inferior games make way, way more money. To an algorithm, or a metric, even miserable feeling variable schedule or reward addiction looks like "engagement." So if there's "engagement" and money, why should companies do anything different? link to this video So how is it that games which have "art" don't come along, charge a bit less money, and win in the marketplace? I guess the argument can be made that they do, but they're in the minority. I wonder if there aren't also generational issues? Maybe the environment of today, where even young people have tablets and smartphones is just a different one?
View on Hacker News