Skip to content
0:00 / 0:00

Is Psychoanalysis Still Relevant in Modern Psychiatry?

Psychofarm

36K subscribers • 68 videos on Rounds

YouTube
  • Recommended by 1 person, 1 of them a clinician or researcher, in r/Psychiatry.
  • Sells products. The upload promotes a product, supplement, program or service, or the speaker sells what they recommend.
  • Debated among experts. Its central claim is contested, so look for the other side.

Aimed at clinicians, students or researchers. Education, not medical advice.

2.1K views1 year ago1 recommendation

Mental healthClinical medicineTherapy and psychologyClinical skills and examsMedical training and practice

An exploration of psychodynamic therapy, personality disorders, and how psychoanalytic concepts remain relevant to modern psychiatric formulation.

Is psychoanalysis still relevant in modern psychiatry and medication management? We unpack psychodynamic therapy, DSM-5 personality disorders, object relations, ego psychology, splitting, projective identification, attachment theory, and how solid psychiatric formulation improves outcomes in treatment resistant depression. 💡Anti-depressant Course: psycho.farm/antidepressant-course 📖 PsychoFarm's Treating Depression Book: a.co/d/3M0uFui ================ Follow PsychoFarm: 🔴SUBSCRIBE ► youtube.com/c/Psychofarm?sub_confirmation=1 🧠Mental Health Resources: psycho.farm/services-4 ➡️Instagram: instagram.com/thepsychofarm/ ➡️Tiktok: tiktok.com/@thepsychofarm ➡️Twitter: twitter.com/ThePsychoFARM ================ Is psychoanalysis still relevant in an era dominated by 15-minute visits and medication management? In this episode we argue yes, because so much of modern psychiatry rests on psychoanalytic foundations: talk therapy itself, the way we do psychiatric formulation, and how we understand personality and relationships in the room. We trace the major schools in plain language: drive theory to ego psychology, object relations, self psychology, and the relational turn. Along the way we translate classic ideas into clinical moves you can use this week. We show how DSM-5 personality disorders connect to older concepts and why personality must sit beside diagnosis when you plan care. You will hear clear examples of splitting and projective identification and how they show up with help-rejecting or highly reactive patients. We outline a practical “levels of personality functioning” lens that spans neurotic, borderline, and psychotic ranges and explain why CBT-style skills often help at healthier levels while deeper work is needed when integration collapses under stress. We revisit Erikson’s stages as an accessible map of development that echoes older psychosexual ideas without the jargon. We connect attachment theory’s day-to-day language to object relations, showing how early internalized models of self and other drive later patterns like idealize-devalue loops or chronic disappointment. We discuss the role of language in treatment, why naming problems can regulate affect, and how diagnoses can reshape identity and behavior for better or worse. If you work with “treatment resistant depression,” this conversation is for you. Many multi-med failures reflect a missing formulation rather than purely biological nonresponse. We walk through cases where attention to personality, defenses, and the therapeutic frame changes the plan more than the next SSRI switch. Whether you are a trainee learning DSM criteria, a resident cramming for boards, or a practicing clinician juggling 20-minute follow ups, this episode will help you see why psychodynamic concepts are not optional history but daily tools. Intro & Disclaimer Is Psychoanalysis Relevant? Terms & Forma

Why it's here

1 person recommends this

What people say. Recommended by a psychiatrist as a thoughtful discussion on the role of psychodynamic therapy in modern clinical practice.

u/zenarcade3Psychiatrist (Verified)in r/Psychiatry • Recommends

Is Psychoanalysis Still Relevant in Modern Psychiatry?