Skip to content
0:00 / 0:00

The surprising habits of original thinkers | Adam Grant | TED

TED

28M subscribers • 27 videos on Rounds

YouTube
  • Recommended by 1 person, in Hacker News.
  • Presented by Adam Grant, organizational psychologist, as the video describes them

For anyone, no background needed. Education, not medical advice.

11M views10 years ago1 recommendation

Brain and nervesMemory and learning

Adam Grant explains how creative thinkers, or originals, embrace failure, procrastinate strategically, and generate many ideas to find success.

Visit TED.com to get our entire library of TED Talks, transcripts, translations, personalized talk recommendations and more. How do creative people come up with great ideas? Organizational psychologist Adam Grant studies "originals": thinkers who dream up new ideas and take action to put them into the world. In this talk, learn three unexpected habits of originals — including embracing failure. "The greatest originals are the ones who fail the most, because they're the ones who try the most," Grant says. "You need a lot of bad ideas in order to get a few good ones." Adam hosts the TED Audio Collective podcast WorkLife with Adam Grant--a show that takes you inside the minds of some of the world's most unusual professionals to discover the keys to a better work life. Listen to WorkLife with Adam Grant wherever you get your podcasts. Subscribe to the TED Audio Collective: youtube.com/TEDAudioCollective The TED Talks channel features the best talks and performances from the TED Conference, where the world's leading thinkers and doers give the talk of their lives in 18 minutes (or less). Look for talks on Technology, Entertainment and Design -- plus science, business, global issues, the arts and more. You're welcome to link to or embed these videos, forward them to others and share these ideas with people you know. Follow TED on Twitter: twitter.com/TEDTalks Like TED on Facebook: facebook.com/TED Subscribe to our channel: youtube.com/TED TED's videos may be used for non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons License, Attribution–Non Commercial–No Derivatives (or the CC BY – NC – ND 4.0 International) and in accordance with our TED Talks Usage Policy ted.com/about/our-organization/our-policies-terms/ted-talks-…. For more information on using TED for commercial purposes (e.g. employee learning, in a film or online course), please submit a Media Request at media-requests.ted.com

Why it's here

1 person recommends this

What people say. Recommended for its insights into creativity, original thinking, and how non-conformists contribute to innovation.

longnguyenin Hacker News • Recommends

On “Ask HN: How can I get better at original thinking and being creative?”

…. After practicing this for around a year, I developed a custom 3D visualization for our 3D scanner3 which greatly improved the UX. Our customers loved it. We even filed a patent for it (pending though)4 For me, that little puzzle is usually a leetcode5 problem, or to solve a non-trivial rubik (my humble collection here6). 1: link 2: link to this video 3: link 4: link 5: link 6: link…

rkindiin Hacker News • Mentions

On “Show HN: VidDistill – Automated YouTube Video Summarization Using Captions”

That's a really good point. I'll update the site to have a default video in the text field so that you can have a quick and easy way to test the site without thinking about a video you want to try. In the meantime, I've compiled some URLs that you can paste into the text field! Where's Google going next? | Larry Page link The surprising habits of original thinkers | Adam Grant link to this video The Art of Letting Go | The Minimalists | TEDxFargo link Thanks for the feedback!

ConfusedDogin Hacker News • Mentions

On “Xsolla fires 150 employees using analysis of chat and email activity”

This reminds me of Ted Talks about the original thinkers by Adam Grant: link to this video Just because these people are not behaving or contributing the same way like others, it doesn't mean they are worthless. If company design the work "game" like such, people will try to cheat the game like automatically producing whole bunch of crap on daily basis - is that productive? Then, they will have to figure out an anti-cheat, on and on. Play stupid game, get stupid prizes. For people who might want to work for them, this really a turn off. What kind of potential metrics they could be looking for next? If a person made a 2000 line code that impacted the whole company, but that's all the code that person pr…