Skip to content
0:00 / 0:00

Richard Dawkins demonstrates the evolution of the eye

poejavlo

263 subscribers • 1 video on Rounds

YouTube
  • Recommended by 2 people, in Hacker News, across 2 different months.
  • Presented by Professor Richard Dawkins, as the video describes them

For anyone, no background needed. Education, not medical advice.

238K views14 years ago2 recommendations

How the body worksAnatomyPhysiologyGenetics and genomics

Richard Dawkins demonstrates how a complex organ like the eye can evolve through incremental, beneficial steps from simple light-sensitive cells.

Creationists and supporters of Intelligent Design like to point to what they call the "irreducible complexity" of the eye as proof of the existence of a designer/creator. In other words, they like to say that complex components of our physiology like the eye could not have come about through a process of evolution because they are not of any use until everything is in place and working. In this excerpt from his lecture "Growing Up In The Universe: Climbing Mount Improbable", Professor Dawkins demonstrates how something complex like the eye can indeed evolve. See all five "Growing Up In The Universe" lectures by Richard Dawkins in their entirety here: richannel.org/christmas-lectures/1991/richard-dawkins

Why it's here

2 people recommend this

What people say. Recommended as a clear demonstration of how the complex structure of the eye evolved incrementally, refuting the idea of irreducible complexity.

adrusiin Hacker News • Recommends

On “Bacterial cells are small 'eyeballs', scientists discover”

Actually the history of the eye has been farily well understood, and the various stages of its evolution can be seen in animals that exist today. Dawkins explains it: link to this video

yargin Hacker News • Recommends

On “Using paleogenomics to elucidate 10k years of immune system evolution”

Dawkins invalidating the notion that the eye is irreducably complex: link to this video . Showing quite clearly how incremental beneficial change leads to the development of complex features. But it will never matter to creationists: link . (Don't even bother with that last link.) They'll always just build another straw man.

Slackwisein Hacker News • Mentions

On “First Mechanical Gear Found in a Living Creature”

Just because something looks "engineered", doesn't mean it is. A perfect example is the eye. An organ of great complexity, but one that is very easily explained by logical evaluation, as well as existing living creatures and fossils: link to this video If you're a software engineer, I hope you understand how procedural systems and algorithms can transform data and functions. Similar processes take place via chemistry and biological interaction. Conway's Game of Life is a good example of a simple system giving rise to complex interaction and patterns. Complex beauty can arise from the interaction of systems, but if you say to yourself that it "must have been engineered by something greater than me", you…

glegleglein Hacker News • Mentions

On “A Lens-Less Camera Built Specially for AI and Computer Vision Programs”

Makes me think of Dawkins' demonstration of eye evolution, where he shows the usefulness of even simple photo-receptor designs: link to this video