Skip to content
0:00 / 0:00

14. Limbic System

Stanford

2.2M subscribers • 7 videos on Rounds

YouTube
  • Recommended by 1 person, in Hacker News.
  • Presented by Robert Sapolsky, Stanford neurobiology professor, as the video describes them

Assumes interest and some biology. Education, not medical advice.

2M views15 years ago1 recommendation

Brain and nervesMental healthNeuroscienceStressDepression and anxiety

Robert Sapolsky explains the structure and function of the limbic system and its role in regulating emotions and behavior.

(April 30, 2010) Robert Sapolsky focuses on the role of the limbic system as the emotional component of the nervous system. He explores its influence on decision making, its connection to the cortex, and the various functions of subparts within the limbic system circuitry. Stanford University: stanford.edu/ Stanford Department of Biology: biology.stanford.edu/ Stanford University Channel on YouTube: youtube.com/stanford

Why it's here

1 person recommends this

What people say. Recommended as an excellent academic lecture explaining the biological basis of emotions, stress, and anxiety.

mattdeboardin Hacker News • Recommends

On “Practical Facts about the Human Brain”

…ay. The rest match up with some of the stuff I've read/watched. Watch some videos by Robert Sapolsky on YouTube. He's a neurostuff prof at Stanford. Good presentations. There's "Why Zebras Don't Get Ulcers" link Also an actual academic lecture on the Limbic System which contextualizes & clarifies some of the other assertions in the OP blog post. link to this video There are more but hopefully YouTube's algorithm helps you out there. The Stanford lecture series is very interesting though Sapolsky doesn't deliver all the lectures. edit: The only plausible, good faith explanation of the amygdala-empathy claim I can think of is that there are facial recognition studies designed to activate the amygdala […

mairein Hacker News • Mentions

On “How Inuit parents teach kids to control their anger”

Anger is chemical and not psychological and will pass. See Sapolsky's discussion of the Limbic system: link to this video When I am angry I am self aware enough to wait until the chemicals are gone in order to discuss things. I don't think this is unhealthy in any way. In fact, I usually don't like the feeling of anger and look forward with happiness to the calm that will follow. It is interesting that the original source of anger becomes resolved once the chemicals are gone. I found it interesting that the Inuits do the same thing.

h0l0cubein Hacker News • Mentions

On “Anxiety is in your body, not your mind”

The argument makes more sense when you realise that Valium/Diazepam is basically a muscle relaxant. Edit: Source here, happy to hear from another domain expert refuting this link to this video

h0l0cubein Hacker News • Mentions

On “Anxiety is in your body, not your mind”

Maybe it's not strictly true, but got this from Robert Sapolsky (Stanford neurobiology professor): link to this video His opinion, or the best understandings on this, might have changed though. From the YT transcript: > Here's somebody taking Valium for anxiety, and here's somebody taking Valium to relax their muscles. What's up with that? It's the exact same thing. And it is a very James-Lange moment. What's part of anxiety about? It's monitoring the level of tension in your body. It's getting feedback from muscle tone. He seems to be suggesting that the mode of action for Valium to reduce anxiety is that of reducing muscle tone. Not an expert, so I can't argue about it.